<ibshambat2004@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1166781374.659485.271250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inner conflict is a result of having inside many motives and
> influences. In all but the most closed cultures and most closed minds,
> inner conflict is inevitable.
But is your nekkid dribble inevitable?
Or are you clothes minded?
--
-------------------------------------------
AJ - http://****In.Com
e In.
(800 folders. -- kiddie-filtered -- FREE,
Usenet ****.)
>
> The closed cultures create a form of integrity, but it is a false
> integrity. It is an integrity of never having stirred, never gone
> beyond the formative dogmas, and never experienced reality outside of
> the formulated mind. It is therefore an integrity based on a falsehood,
> and while some may be deluded into thinking the minds like that to be
> ethically superior, the cause - shelteredness and lack of curiosity -
> shows the premises of this integrity to be fallacious, and thus the
> entire edifice to be a lie.
>
> The mind that is open to many influences frequently is confused.
> However as it integrates the multiple influences it arrives at a
> superior integrity - the dynamic integrity that is a result of
> integration of multiple viewpoints and multiple experiences. Such an
> integrity is frequently fragile, but it contains greater Knowledge and
> Wisdom than does the integrity of the closed mind, and as such is a
> more informed guide to action, which means that it has a greater chance
> to lead to action that is responsible (seeing the entire range of the
> consequences of the actions and being able to take responsibility for
> the result).
>
> To move from Confusion toward Dynamic Integrity, it is frequently
> useful to perform a mental operation I call Integrative Cognition.
> Links follow.
>
> <1153940604.648603.213980@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <1153940669.447102.94670@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
|
