Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Dance > Creativity > Re: DIY SF
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 31 Topic 1022 of 1079
Post > Topic >>

Re: DIY SF

by Don Bruder <dakidd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 26, 2007 at 09:10 PM

In article <f3at79$2912$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (David Goldfarb) wrote:

> In article <4658ce99$0$27161$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Don Bruder  <dakidd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >Drop 'em on land and things are likely gonna get *REAL* ugly in a big 
> >hurry, for a long time, and over a wide area due to the dust/debris 
> >clouds. A "Nuclear Winter" scenario, without the "Nuclear", I'd expect.

> 
> Yep....
> 
> >Drop 'em in the oceans, and coastal lowlands get washed away by massive

> >tsunamis, but inland/higher elevation areas areas see little (if 
> >anything) more than a short-term increase in precipitation.
> 
> Nope.  Dropping them in the oceans is worse, climate-wise, than dropping
> them on land.  A lot worse.  See, for instance, the article "Giant
> Meteor Impact" in the  March 1966 issue of _Analog_.
> 
> (You get water va**** instead of dust, yes...but you get *a lot more*
> water va**** than you would dust.)

Well, yeah, lotsa water va****...

Seems pretty counterintuitive that a significant amount of it could 
remain aloft (and therefore, a problem) for more than a short time, 
though. I'd expect that, local to the drop point, the air would go 
pretty close to supersaturated, and the vast majority of the water would 
almost immediately rain out without carrying very far (comparatively 
speaking) from the point of impact. Especially if local sun-blocking 
effects from the cloud created were to cause a temperature drop in the 
area - Even quicker condensation and rain-out would be my expectation 
then. 

Wouldn't mind taking a look at that article you mention - is it online 
anywhere handy? 1966 was a bit before my subscription got started, 
doncha know :) (I didn't "discover" Analog until about 1979 or so, and 
then only managed to find a copy s****adically between then and 1982, 
when I finally got around to subscribing for a couple years)

-- 
Don Bruder - dakidd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - If your "From:" address isn't on my
whitelist,
or the subject of the message doesn't contain the exact text
"PopperAndShadow"
somewhere, any message sent to this address will go in the garbage without
my
ever knowing it arrived. Sorry... <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd>
for more
info
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-26 12:56:06 
Re: DIY SF
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-26 13:02:26 
Re: DIY SF
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2007-05-26 13:54:09 
Re: DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-26 17:27:00 
Re: DIY SF
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2007-05-26 18:46:27 
Re: DIY SF
Joe Bednorz <invalid@[  2007-05-26 14:24:11 
Re: DIY SF
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2007-05-26 15:46:55 
Re: DIY SF
"Mike Schilling"  2007-05-28 20:48:36 
Re: DIY SF
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2007-05-26 15:28:27 
Re: DIY SF
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2007-05-26 19:54:43 
Re: DIY SF
Don Bruder <dakidd@[EM  2007-05-26 17:19:37 
Re: DIY SF
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-05-27 03:16:57 
Re: DIY SF
Don Bruder <dakidd@[EM  2007-05-26 21:10:44 
Re: DIY SF
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2007-05-27 00:25:46 
Re: DIY SF
Don Bruder <dakidd@[EM  2007-05-26 22:38:18 
Re: DIY SF
Kay Shapero <kay@[EMAI  2007-05-29 07:37:43 
Re: DIY SF
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2007-05-27 00:23:15 
Re: DIY SF
"David M. Palmer&quo  2007-05-27 17:56:48 
Re: DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-27 14:54:30 
Re: DIY SF
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2007-05-27 15:11:53 
Re: DIY SF
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2007-05-27 16:51:40 
Re: DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-27 21:28:32 
Re: DIY SF
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2007-05-28 08:42:46 
Re: DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-28 11:47:44 
Re: DIY SF
David McMillan <spamtr  2007-05-29 08:12:00 
Re: DIY SF
"Gary R. Schmidt&quo  2007-05-27 14:23:42 
Re: DIY SF
Gerry Quinn <gerryq@[E  2007-05-27 14:38:11 
Re: DIY SF
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2007-05-28 05:51:58 
Re: DIY SF
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2007-05-28 11:55:56 
Re: DIY SF
rja.carnegie@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-28 08:25:20 
Re: DIY SF
"Paul Ian Harman&quo  2007-05-29 15:28:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Aug 20 15:54:18 CDT 2008.