"ZerkonX" <Z@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.12.29.15.24.00.271948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:05:49 -0800, ibshambat wrote:
>
>> In effect, there are good hearts and bad hearts at every level of
>> intellect.
>
> In effect, in order to greatly simplify things only for the sake of a
> discussion, 'hearts' are divided up into two opposing metaphorical
> differences. While having no basis in truth and wallowing in the same
> stereotypes it fains to refute, it enables the participant/reader to
feel
> above the common fray of the mistaken and ignorant m*****.
>
Ther has been some significant studies on heart replacement recipients,
whereby some of the doners characteristics are passed on.
The double blind is "in built" as the subjects were unaware of the
identity
of the doner..
Problems with such studies, it provides remarkaable information with no
chance of "traditional" explanation, and is often not pursued for that
reason.
BOfL
|
