<ibshambat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8101f64d-ddf3-4a27-8c29-b8729d7ba59f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec 30 2007, 10:54 am, "brian fletcher" <brian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "ZerkonX" <Z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.12.29.15.24.00.271948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007
> 11:05:49 -0800, ibshambat wrote:
>
> >> In effect, there are good hearts and bad hearts at every level of
> >> intellect.
>
> > In effect, in order to greatly simplify things only for the sake of a
> > discussion, 'hearts' are divided up into two opposing metaphorical
> > differences. While having no basis in truth and wallowing in the same
> > stereotypes it fains to refute, it enables the participant/reader to
> > feel
> > above the common fray of the mistaken and ignorant m*****.
>
> Ther has been some significant studies on heart replacement recipients,
> whereby some of the doners characteristics are passed on.
>
> The double blind is "in built" as the subjects were unaware of the
> identity
> of the doner..
This is excellent. I am wondering, does this happen also with
transplants of organs other than the heart?
> Problems with such studies, it provides remarkaable information with no
> chance of "traditional" explanation, and is often not pursued for that
> reason.
Another proof of the bigotry of the materialist fundamentalists.
There is some evidence regarding other organ transplants.
One beautiful example, is a building labourer received a heart transplant,
and after recovery, developed a passion for opera. This dumbfounded his
family....Guess what the doners passion was ????
Bigotry chooses people, not the converse.
People are where they need to be, to experience what they need for
growth.
BOfL
|
