Re: Hustles Woes

On Apr 22, 9:16 pm, "Ron N." <rhnlo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 11:49 am, swingandhustle <swingandhus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Regarding the lack of Young Hustle dancers - to solve any problem, I
> > believe we must first correctly identifying the problem space.  As I
> > see it, our problem space is really ...
>
> The problem space is much bigger than you realize.  Think
> about how few dances there are that are currently widely
> popular that weren't mostly codified over half-a-century
> ago.  How many are there?  Salsa-On-One is the only one
> I've seen worldwide (and some might argue that it's not
> really a different dance than Mambo or Son).  Maybe Tango
> Nuevo.  Maybe Nightclub 2-Step in the U.S.  These among
> lots of dead or passing fad dances.  The odds of "tweaking"
> an existing dance and making the new variant popular might
> be roughly zero, rounded to the nearest whole percent.
>
> Be glad that the Hustle still exists as an actual social
> dance, and not something the Richard Powers has to
> "reconstruct" for a historical demonstration.
>
> IMHO. YMMV.
> --
> rhn A.T nicholson d.0.t C-o-M

The dance we do is sling hustle between 120 - 135 BPM and counted 12&3